Home Forums Blogs

Forums

  • User Login
  • Password
  • Keep me logged in

State of Delaware Public Issues

This is a forum for open discussion of public issues in the state of Delaware. If you would like to participate, please sign up by clicking "register" at the top of the page. Then log in to post a comment. No personal attacks or profanities, please.

Display: Tree Flat

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES….. FACT

Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:55 AM

roadwarrior

Join Date: 06/29/2013

Posts: 1447

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES….. FACT

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES…..  FACT        

When fallacies are committed intentionally to manipulate or persuade by deception, they are considered propaganda aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward or against some person or group by presenting false ideas, and are usually repeated and dispersed over a wide range of media to create the chosen result in the public’s attitudes. Republicans have, with their media outlet FOX Noise, spread propaganda that the nation’s current economic problems are founded in excessive spending by the Obama Administration, and traditionally, they have labeled all Democrats as big-spenders for the past thirty years. Throughout the President’s first term, and especially since the beginning of the 112thCongress, Republicans have sought Draconian spending cuts targeting safety nets while defending tax cuts for the rich, and it has been at the forefront of the GOP’s negotiations to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff they claim requires drastic spending cuts as long as defense and tax cuts for the rich are exempted.

Under President Obama’s leadership, government spending is at its lowest levels since Ronald Reagan’s administration, and in fact, the President’s spending is the lowest since the Eisenhower Administration. However, those are easily verified facts and if there is one thing Republicans avoid like plague, it is easily verified facts.

One simple fact Republicans understand, but many in the population do not, is that the first year of every presidential term starts with a previous administration’s budget approved by Congress.  Republicans began their lying by counting 2009′s fiscal year budget as the President’s even though it began four months before he moved into the White House, and included spending increases of hundreds of billions of dollars in response to Bush-Republicans’ economic and financial catastrophe. In the 2009 fiscal year budget, the last of George W. Bush’s presidency, federal spending rose by 17.9% from $2.98 trillion to $3.52 trillion, and the first budget attributable to President Obama (fiscal 2010), spending fell 1.8% to $3.46 trillion. In fiscal 2013, the final budget of the President’s first term, spending is scheduled to fall 1.3% to $3.58 trillion according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and extended out means that over the President’s first four budget years, federal spending is on track to rise from $3.52 trillion to $3.58 trillion, an annualized increase of just 0.4%. Obviously, there has been no huge increase in spending under President Obama, and yet Republicans claim he has been on a spending binge that is the sole cause of the nation’s economic woes.  Republicans do have their problems when it comes to the real facts.  

Looking back at annualized growth in federal spending, the biggest spender was Ronald Reagan (8.7%) followed closely by Bush II (8.1%), Bush I (5.4%), and Bill Clinton (3.2%). As a matter of fact, even Clinton’s low of 3.2% federal spending growth is nearly two-and-a-half times higher than President Obama’s 1.4% during his first term in office. Reagan and George W. Bush’s spending were over five times as high as President Obama, and yet they are considered avatars of fiscal responsibility by conservatives of all shapes and sizes. There are two specific reasons conservatives portray the President as a big spender, and as is usually the case with anything Republicans or their conservative think tanks characterize, they lie, and one of the biggest purveyors of mendacity is the Heritage Foundation.

In May 2012, two Heritage writers claimed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (stimulus) was excessive and an “utter failure” and that Social Security is one of the main drivers of future deficits. First, the so-called “utter failure” of the stimulus meme has been debunked, disproved, and denied by every economist that is not in the employ of the Heritage Foundation, and yet they persist in propagandizing the lie to the point that Adolf Hitler’s propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, would envy their ability to “tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, so people will eventually come to believe it.” According to the CBO, the stimulus created approximately 3.5 million jobs and raised the GDP between 1.1 and 3.5 percent and continued improving employment numbers through the end of 2012. Unemployment figures have borne out the CBO’s predictions despite the Heritage liars’ contention the stimulus was an utter failure.

The Heritage Foundation also perpetuates the filthy lie that Social Security is entitlement spending, one of the main drivers of future deficits, and because President Obama will not address his out of control spending habit, will nearly double by 2050. It makes one weary to repeat a fact borne out by the Social Security Trust statute that the program is forbidden to take one penny from the federal budget and does not, cannot, and will not ever add to the nation’s deficit regardless who is president. However, one of the principle tactics of good propaganda is to “tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, so people will eventually come to believe it,” and the masters of mendacity at the Heritage Foundation are without peer in propagating the lie that Social Security is “one of the main drivers of future deficits,” and all because Barack Obama “has repeatedly failed to tackle entitlement spending.”

Heritage also claims the President wanted a “free pass on last summer’s debt ceiling increase so he could keep spending,” but the historically big-spending Republicans “insisted on spending cuts to accompany any hike in the debt ceiling;” something Republicans never ever required during the Bush Administration’s record spending spree that ranks at number two behind Ronald Reagan as the president overseeing the greatest spending growth in recent memory. Heritage closed out its analysis of President Obama’s spending problem with “The only fiscal restraint this Administration seems to have is restraint to act with great fiscal responsibility,” and it is a direct contradiction of the facts that this President is more fiscally responsible and has shown more spending restraint than Republicans’ man-turned-god, Ronald Reagan.

Republicans and their propaganda machine, the Heritage Foundation, have perpetuated the fallacious contention that all Democrats are big spenders, but none worse than President Obama, and it is unclear if their predisposition to lie is because the President is a Democrat or a Black man. Regardless their reason(s), President Obama has presided over the lowest spending since Eisenhower and five times less than Reagan or Bush II. The ARRA (stimulus) did amount to an increase in spending, but not only did it create millions of jobs and add to GDP growth, it contained tax cuts for 95% of working families, and it is one of those pesky facts Republicans and the Heritage Foundation consider an “utter failure.”

The utter failure of Republicans is acknowledging that President Obama is stingy with federal dollars, and that their spending cut propensity is directly correlated to which party is in the White House. Republicans had no problem blowing up the deficit when Bush II was in the White House, and most Americans are unaware that Bush’s folly in Iraq and Afghanistan were kept out of the budget and still old George and Republicans presided over the second highest federal spending increase since Reagan was president. President Obama gave Republicans a good offer to avoid the dreaded fiscal cliff that included over $800 billion in spending cuts they hardly considered adequate because in their world view, one can never cut enough from services and safety nets.

It is a hard pill for Republicans to swallow, but this President has reduced spending to the point that there is little left to cut without causing more undue harm to tens-of-millions of Americans. However, one must remember that causing harm to the poor, children, Veterans, and seniors is the prime directive of Republicans and their policy machine the Heritage Foundation, and regardless that President Obama leads the pack in reducing spending, Republicans and Heritage will always find more ways to punish Americans whether it is robbing them of their Social Security retirement accounts, cutting food stamps, cutting healthcare spending, slashing Veterans benefits, or eliminating school lunch programs that not only reduces spending, it reduces life expectancy.

You have to laugh at the Republican Party saying we have a real spending problem the day Obama took office – no bid contracts for unfunded wars- no problem. Run a surplus into a big debt- no problem.

Yes that was Boehner, Cantor and crew who approved all of that spending and who violently oppose saving taxpayer dollars by cutting tax breaks for big oil or worse- denying Medicare the option to negotiate lower drug prices- which puts the screws to all Americans.

How soon we all forget.  Seniors have to go to Mexico or Canada to buy prescriptions because big “Pharma” bought off Republicans so American families get the shaft and have to subsidize the rest of the world’s prescription drugs.

REMEMBER TO REGISTER TO VOTE SO YOU CAN VOTE IN THE 2014 MID TERM ELECTIONS…… WE HAVE TO STOP THIS RADICAL RIGHT WING INSANITY FROM SPREADING ITS CANCER TO THE REST OF THE GENERAL POPULATION WHILE WE STILL HAVE TIME TO DO IT…….

Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:00 AM

homeowner

Join Date: 06/26/2012

Posts: 1425

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES….. FACT

That's because he hasn't done his job and built up a reserve. That would have happened if he would have found a way to put people to work rather than giving them handouts and/or bailouts that were unsuccessful. 

Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:20 AM

Bitter Clinger

Join Date: 02/16/2013

Posts: 1005

Re:PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES….. FACT

Legends said "

You have to laugh at the Republican Party saying we have a real spending problem the day Obama took office – no bid contracts for unfunded wars- no problem. Run a surplus into a big debt- no problem.

Yes that was Boehner, Cantor and crew who approved all of that spending and who violently oppose saving taxpayer dollars by cutting tax breaks for big oil or worse- denying Medicare the option to negotiate lower drug prices- which puts the screws to all Americans".

Sorry Legends - Unfortunately The Democrats under Nacy Pelosi controlled the purse strings under GWB.  John Boehner didn't bevme Speaker until 2010.  But then fact was never part of your modus operandi.

By the way "BIG OIL" as you call them do not get any tax breaks that other business gets.  And the best part is that most of those breaks were increased under Bill Clinton.

Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:25 AM

ziva

Join Date: 07/02/2013

Posts: 3682

Re:PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES….. FACT

Homeowner you make no sense again!  If President Obama has failed so in your eyes then why has the auto industry come back from the doomsday of 2008?  Why have 7.6 million private sector jobs been created without the help of Congress?  Why is your party of dysfunctional clowns still in office today doing what they do best - NOTHING?  Not for long though going into 2014 my friend this will change because the American people have had enough…….  You can’t even defend your idiotic party of losers which is really sad to say…..  Don't you get tired of the same old nonsense you post everyday here?  What have you accomplished?  Your going to lose big next year......

Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:34 AM

Bitter Clinger

Join Date: 02/16/2013

Posts: 1005

Re:PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SPENT LESS MONEY THAN ANY REPUBLICAN IN LAST THREE DECADES….. FACT

Dear Ziva - Obama had nothing to do with those 7 million jobs.  In case you haven't come out of your basement recently, the population in the US has grown by more than that in the same time frame.  The FACT is that there are 16 million fewer jobs available in the US today than there were when Obama became president.

That my dear Ziva is FACT not talking point or statistics.


Forum Statistic

Threads : 3822
Posts : 19784
Members : 962

Welcome to our newest member : mommydearest