Home Forums Blogs

Forums

  • User Login
  • Password
  • Keep me logged in

State of Delaware Public Issues

This is a forum for open discussion of public issues in the state of Delaware. If you would like to participate, please sign up by clicking "register" at the top of the page. Then log in to post a comment. No personal attacks or profanities, please.

Display: Tree Flat

Obamacare

Monday, March 12, 2012 05:53 PM

2npz5kn3600004

Join Date: 03/05/2012

Posts: 11

Obamacare

Doesn't look like much of a change if 50 million will be getting insurance via a government program which means you the taxpayer will be footing the bill.

 

Feds release health overhaul blueprint for states

March 12, 2012, 12:41 p.m. EDT
AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tackling a huge logistical challenge, the Obama administration Monday released an ambitious blueprint for states to match up uninsured Americans with coverage that's right for them under the health care overhaul law.

The long-awaited regulation, released as the Supreme Court prepares to hear a challenge to the law, stresses state and federal flexibility.

Starting Jan. 1, 2014, new health insurance markets called exchanges must be up and running in every state, the linchpin of a plan to eventually provide coverage to most of the nation's 50 million uninsured.

The new marketplaces are supposed to work like an Amazon.com for health insurance, providing consumers with one-stop shopping for competitively priced coverage.

"More competition will drive down costs and exchanges will give individuals and small businesses the same purchasing power big businesses have today," Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement.

Experts say it's anybody's guess how the national rollout will go. If a state is not ready, the law requires the federal government to step in to run its exchange. But the Obama administration's request for $800 million to operate federal exchanges has gotten a frosty reception from congressional Republicans.

The new markets are for individuals and small businesses buying plans. Most people who now have employer health insurance will not have to make changes. It's a design that works well in Massachusetts, where an exchange has been in place for several years.

Massachusetts achieved political consensus about its health care overhaul under former GOP Gov. Mitt Romney, who is now seeking his party's presidential nomination. That's far different from the enduring national divisions over President Barack Obama's law, even if it used Romney's as a foundation.

Setting up 50 state exchanges wouldn't be easy even if the federal overhaul enjoyed widespread support.

For things to go smoothly, state and federal officials must work together to verify private personal and financial details for millions of people, make sure that consumers are enrolled in the right health plan, and accurately calculate how much government aid, if any, each household is entitled to.

All that has to get done in hours, not weeks.

Nearly 30 million people are eventually expected to get private health coverage through exchanges, about half of whom are currently uninsured.

Another group of uninsured people — as many as 16 million low-income Americans expected to qualify for Medicaid — could also enter the system through their exchanges.

States are moving in fits and starts to set up the new markets. Many are on the sidelines waiting for the Supreme Court to rule on whether the federal law is constitutional.

Under the law, most Americans will have a legal responsibility to carry health insurance, either through their job, a government program or by buying their own. Millions will receive financial assistance for their premiums.

Whether that amounts to an unconstitutional expansion of federal power is among the subjects of a showdown that begins March 26, when the high court is set to begin an unusual three days of arguments. A decision is expected by June.

Sebelius says she expects the court to uphold Obama's Affordable Care Act and thinks states will move quickly once the court has ruled.

Reaction to the complex new federal regulation will probably take several days to filter in. The administration says it received nearly 25,000 comments, and some aspects of the rule will remain open for additional comment before they are made final.

States have until Jan. 1, 2013 to obtain federal approval for their exchanges. Among the key elements:

— States can receive conditional federal approval for their exchanges if their plans are far along but not final by Jan. 1, 2013. States can operate exchanges in partnership with other states. The federal government will provide funding for different types of exchanges to allow for flexibility.

— The state exchanges themselves will determine the number and type of health plans offered to consumers, within broad standards set by the federal government. Plans will have to comply with marketing rules to ensure they are not trying to cherry-pick the healthiest customers in the state.

— Consumers will be able to apply online for coverage in their state exchanges. To reduce paperwork, exchanges will rely on existing computer databases to verify basic personal information and eligibility. However, some key details, such as whether the consumer is a legal resident of the U.S., may have to be verified by the government. And the IRS will have final say on tax credits.

— Exchanges will be able to pick from two federally approved methods for coordinating with the Medicaid program in their states.

— Exchanges will be able to use intermediaries called "navigators" to help educate consumers and small businesses about how the new system works.

Monday, March 19, 2012 12:17 AM

CamdenHarry

Join Date: 03/18/2012

Posts: 362

Obamacare

Truly the only problem with this here Healthcare Reform Package was that they left out the most important part that being the "PUBLIC OPTION" It was like once they saw that those Hateful Racist Mean-sprited Repuglican Tea-baggers in the Congress were going to block the all most important part of this here Reform that being the "PUBLIC OPTION" It was like the Democrats simply threw up their arms and said lets just go ahead and pass the rest of the package! The entire Healthcare Reform Proposal was built around designed around that there "PUBLIC OPTION" and with out it, even I must admit just passing the rest of this program was a very BAD idea indeed. Heaven only knows that we as a nation need to move to a "SINGLE-PAYER NATIONAL HEALTHCARE INSURANCE PLAN such as our neighbor to the North Canada and the Canadian people have already enjoyed for decades already! With Healthcare Inflation running at a 6-7% annual rate, our U.S. economy can not hold up much longer under this kind of Fiscal Strain nor can the U.S. economy compete in the Global Marketplace! Maybe the Democrats figured go ahead pass the rest of put in place the rest of the Healthcare Reform Plan! Then latter on with in a few years they will be able to get the "PUBLIC OPTION" added back in and then we the American Public will be able to finally enjoy comprehensive Healthcare Reform that is so very sorely needed.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 03:40 PM

tspong

Join Date: 04/06/2010

Posts: 972

Obamacare

    Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Americans want the Supreme Court to uphold our health care rights

    Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, seniors are getting help paying for prescription drugs, young adults are able to stay on their parents’ health plan until age 26, women can get affordable preventive care, and children can no longer be denied coverage due to a pre-existing condition.

    Over the next few years, even more protections will be rolled out giving every single American access to high-quality, affordable health coverage.

    The lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act are political stunts by right-wing politicians who are hoping to score big points with their base.

    Judges on both sides of the political spectrum have reviewed and upheld the law, and the Supreme Court should do the same.

    It’s time to for anti-health-care Republicans to stop fighting against the Affordable Care Act and start working to implement protections that will help millions of American families.

    The Affordable Care Act will make a difference for your family.

    Carol Collins

    Dover

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 03:49 PM

CamdenHarry

Join Date: 03/18/2012

Posts: 362

Obamacare

It will come down to whether or not Justice Joseph Kennedy had a good healthy satisfing bowel movement that morning that they all proceed to vote! I know when Men reach the age of Me and Justice Kennedy that pretty much is all we have to look forward to when we get up each and every morning! If its GOOD we are in a very Happy Pleasant mood Jovial dancing around BUT should it be BAD look out Mama!!!!!!!

Thursday, March 29, 2012 01:13 PM

tspong

Join Date: 04/06/2010

Posts: 972

Obamacare

    Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Socialized health care is not American!

 

    Socialized health care against the will of the people is not American. Obamacare is unconstitutional! The U.S. Supreme Court has heard arguments for Obamacare and against Obamacare and in June the Supreme Court Justices will render their decision/opinion. WE THE PEOPLE (51-percenters) that pay taxes to the state and federal government proclaim that Obamacare is unconstitutional and do not want Obama’s socialized health care rammed down our throats in the same manner that European and Canadian countries do to their citizens.

 

    What is at stake here before the Supreme Court Justices is the individual mandate clause in reference to forcing people to purchase health insurance.

 

    Yesterday U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued that even if the mandate cannot be justified as a regulation of interstate commerce, it is a legitimate exercise of Congress’s tax power! How much MORE tyrannical does this language need to get to see where Caesar Obama is going with his vision of imperial power, especially, when telling the Russians a few days ago that after he is re-elected he will be able to do ... more?

 

    In McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, in 1819, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall said, "Upon the supposition, that the bank is constitutionally created, this is the only question; and this question seems unanswered, as soon as it is stated. If the states may tax the bank, to what extent shall they tax it, and where shall they stop? An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy; because there is a limit beyond which no institution and no property can bear taxation ... ."

 

    In June, WE THE PEOPLE will either be beneficiaries of socialized health care where the federal government will be our health care providers, or be free of such medical anarchy and madness!

 

    George F. Krauss

 

    Felton


Forum Statistic

Threads : 1392
Posts : 5145
Members : 721

Welcome to our newest member : GodPunishesHaters